Sometimes
it’s easy to classify a genre. Stories with demons are
horror. Stories involving criminal behaviour are crime stories.
It’s easy, so we think. But recently there’s been
a habit by the horror industry to steal crime fiction’s
thunder with the “serial killer” story.
Serial killers are a relatively recent phenomenon in terms
of their actually being recognised as a bona fide phenomenon.
There have been instances throughout history of serial murderers,
but the phrase “serial killer” erupted sometime
around the thirties of forties. Quickly, due to the horrific
nature of their crimes, serial killers were used as the basis
for a number of novels. Multiple murderers who strike without
pity or remorse make for a scary adversary. They are the ultimate
darkness against which we shine the torch of our own morality.
They can be excellent foils for society illuminating hypocrisy
or that which we neglect.
And
recently they have become the ultimate bogeyman.
It was the invention of Hannibal Lecter that really blurred
the lines. He was a horrific character and yet too grand guignol
to be properly real, particularly by the third book in the
sequence. He was the boogey-man. He was a respected member
of society who killed simply because he could. He was defiant
at an explanation for his behaviour. He was a force of nature,
much like the aforementioned devils of the horror novel. Indeed,
this template of the serial killer as a force for evil, a
reflection of our twisted times, has led to his inclusion
in the ranks of horror. Next time you look at the racks of
the horror shelf, just check how many serial killer books
there are mixed among the usual grotesqueries.
But
the essential difference between the crime fiction serial
and the horror serial lies in this idea of the boogey-man.
While the crime fiction serial killer may indeed be some kind
of boogey man, ultimately he is understandable on some level.
He is evil, but evil as a product of his twisted childhood.
Many of the horror genre’s serial killers are bloodthirsty
beasts who were merely born that way. They are Michael Myers
in Halloween, even as children they are “pure evil”.
This
pure evil aspect makes them somehow other than human. Returning
to Michael Myers (in the first Halloween movie where there
was no true hint of the supernatural about him other than
his ferocious strength and anger) this serves to alienate
the criminal from humanity. In the crime thriller, the serial
killer often has intensely magnified human aspects and frailties.
Often it is the person’s weakness that leads them down
the road to their blood lust.
In
James Ellroy’s early novel, Silent Terror (Killer on
the Road) we are taken through the formation of a serial killer
to his ultimate incarceration. While, unusually for a crime
novel, this is through the killer’s POV, the novel is
not horror in the sense that the aspect of the killer is always
human. He is a weak man in many ways, only able to truly express
himself through death. Perhaps worryingly, also, Silent Terror
seems almost confessional with events in the killer’s
early life echoing (albeit distantly) Ellroy’s troubled
adolescence.
This
presentation of the serial killer as protagonist is unusual
in crime fiction, although not in horror. Possibly the reason
for this is that horror, in its efforts to disturb, lens itself
easily to the presentation of a warped psyche. Hence, the
final novel in the Lecter trilogy (Hannibal) is more horror
than crime, presenting to us almost first hand Lecter’s
unusual and warped thought processes.
Generally, however, in crime fiction we’re presented
with the serial killer as antagonist, often invisible to the
protagonist for much of the novel. Most of the time they exist
somewhere close to the protagonist, a boss or colleague. Examples
of this include Michael Connelly’s superb The Poet or
Mark Billingham’s excellent London-based thriller, Sleepyhead.
But
it’s hard to separate entirely the horror serial killer
from the criminal serial killer. In fact much of the time
it feels like they’ve stolen something from us, warped
it into their vocabulary and then slipped into the night before
we even knew what was happening. Of course, there is no denying
that crime and horror have much in common: a sense of outrage
at atrocities beyond our control. A sense of disorientation
at being thrust into a world outside of our normal rules and
boundaries and in this respect the character of the serial
killer slips seamlessly into the shadows of both worlds. He
is both a human agent and something other than human; obeying
a subset of rules that law-abiding citizens cannot comprehend.
The serial killer can be both a terrifying manifestation of
evil and a parable of human weakness. The extreme nature of
their crimes can be overly dramatic, sometimes utterly unbelievable
(in the opinion of the author, this mainly occurs within the
horror genre where the serial killer is more extreme, sometimes
to an almost ridiculous level) but can also serve to point
to more realistic problems within society.
|