Lin
Anderson has released two previous Rhona McCloud novels: Drift
Net and Torch. Her official website can be found at:www.lin-anderson.com/
|
|
There’s
a conspiracy afoot in Lin Anderson’s latest forensic thriller
featuring her series character, pathologist Rhona McCloud. It starts
with a severed foot washed ashore on a remote Scottish Island. As
Rhona McCloud searches for answers, shadowy agencies conspire to
stop her investigation and her personal life threatens to self destruct
as she uncovers dark secrets in her homeland that have horrific
implications for the future of science.
With a bouncy
prose style and a great sense of character, Lin Anderson’s
third novel featuring Rhona McCloud makes an extremely promising
start. With a well rounded central character, who doesn’t
suffer from the quirk-itis typical of most forensic heroes and a
grey and gritty vision of modern Glasgow in stark contrast to the
rural Scotland of the North, Deadly Code grabs you by the hand and
pulls you into its world with ease.
The Glasgow
she presents is a city of polar opposites; from the jazz club near
the forensics centre (run by McCloud’s current squeeze, the
slightly dodgy but irrepressibly charming Sean) and Rhona’s
own beautiful flat in a well presented area of the city, to the
run down and overcrowded tenements where we find two characters
who may have more than a passing – if unintentional –
involvement in the central conspiracy, Spike and Esther, struggling
to live a life with no family, no future, no real income. It’s
a touching portrait and when these lives start to cross over, there’s
a tension between the relative stability of Rhona’s world
and the day-to-day struggle of Spike and Esther. Anderson adeptness
at presenting both sides of the city – the affluent and the
dirt poor – is touching and grounded in reality.
The reality
of Glasgow’s social split is presented particularly in an
early scene where Rhona catches the Glasgow Underground back to
her flat. She sees a woman nearby in need of help, clearly out of
luck and out of money, and she ignores the problem. She feels bad
but there is nothing she can do. The detail in the scene is sparse
but affecting (and ultimately important to the plot) and manages
to tell the reader not only everything they need to know about Rhona
from her guilt at not helping, but also everything you need about
the city and what it can do to even the most generous and caring
of people at times.
Anderson is
a very natural writer. She writes effortlessly, holding your attention
without drawing undue attention to her obvious skill. She writes
naturally, something that perhaps comes from her background as a
TV scriptwriter. Her dialogue flows smoothly and naturally, avoiding
the typical Scots temptation of writing overdone rural dialect.
Unfortunately,
for all of Anderson’s excellent technical skills, the book
failed to work for this particular reviewer. As the plot unfolds,
and the shadowy conspiracy is revealed, the book began to lose its
credibility for me. The complex conspiracy presented in the plot
turns the novel from a well presented forensic mystery into a high
concept thriller. Sadly, the shift in tone which occurs maybe three
quarters of the way through the book failed to pull me along with
it. With plot suddenly overtaking character and an international
conspiracy – albeit with some personal relevance for Dr McLeod
– revealing itself, we are suddenly distanced from the characters.
As a result the action ceases to have as much relevance to us. The
problem lies in the fact that it all feels too glossy, too high
concept and too late in the story. The book itself is too short
to deal properly with the conspiracy angle; the themes just too
large for the relatively little exploration they are given. And
something about the setting just feels wrong. The conspiracy in
this book just doesn’t feel comfortable in that Highland setting.
It possible certainly, but doesn’t feel entirely plausible.
Strangely I feel I could accept in a foreign setting with ease,
but set in Scotland it just feels too large, too over the top.
It’s a
terrible shame and more my fault than Anderson’s, perhaps,
that I find myself unable to accept the central premise of the conspiracy.
Anderson’s friendly writing and firm grasp on character and
place deserve a plot that felt more in-keeping with its tone. Ultimately,
the grand premise of the book – that overtakes the excellent
character work done in the first three quarters – spoiled
my enjoyment.
It is a shame
because, until that shift in plot and scope occurred, I was enjoying
Anderson’s work. She is a fine – in fact, an excellent
– writer, but if she wants to succeed entirely she either
has to widen her scope and pay out the conspiracy or else tighten
her focus and present to us the kind of social realism she has it
in her ability to portray. She is the kind of writer who could write
either style with great aplomb and success but, sadly, Deadly Code
falls midway between the two and ultimately one is left a little
disappointed. If it wants to properly portray the kind of international
shadow conspiracy and high concept thriller world she presents to
us in the final third of the book (something that is foreshadowed
by the relative weakness of early scenes set in LA compared to those
set in Glasgow) Anderson needs to give us the high stakes earlier
in the book, take the time to explore the conspiracy rather than
presenting it to us in a rush at the end of the novel. At 218 pages,
the novel is just too short to present the kind of complex conspiracy
it wants to frighten us with. However, I, for one, would like to
see her take the tack presented in the opening two thirds where
Anderson presents a modern, social Scotland and a dark, no nonsense
attitude to death and violence.
Deadly Code
is a well written, excellently characterised novel from a talented
writer. It is unfortunate that the final quarter of the novel undoes
all of Anderson’s good work, but if you can deal with the
shift in tone there is a lot here to reward you. Anderson is a writer
worth watching, but she needs to find a more consistent tone. This
reviewer, despite his reservations on the ending of Deadly Code,
will be keeping a close eye out for Anderson’s future work.
|